Previous Teer Result List

Teer is a legally regulated archery sport in the state of Meghalaya, conducted daily by registered archery associations under the oversight of the state government through the Meghalaya Amusements and Betting Tax Act, 1982. One of the hallmarks of a well-run, publicly regulated sporting event is that its outcomes are declared openly, and anyone, researcher, journalist, cultural historian, or curious reader, can inspect the record. Maintaining a transparent, searchable archive of declared results is therefore a genuine public service. It is the data-journalism equivalent of posting published cricket scorecards or football match reports: the outcomes have already been made public by the official organisers, and aggregating them in one accessible place makes it easier for ordinary readers to follow, compare and understand the sport over time.

Our archive is descriptive, not prescriptive. It documents what has been declared. It does not advise, does not predict, and does not provide tips. The value of a good archive is that it preserves the record accurately and lets the reader draw their own conclusions. In that spirit, this page is intended for anyone who wants to look up a specific historical date, study month-over-month trends in the published outcomes for research or journalism, or simply satisfy the human curiosity of "what happened on this day in this game last year".

Every row you see in the tables above has travelled through a specific workflow designed for accuracy. Understanding this pipeline helps you trust the data and also understand its limits.

1. Declaration at the counter. The official archery association conducts the event at its designated venue, counts arrows according to the published scoring method, and declares the two-digit result. This declaration is the primary source of truth.
2. Multi-source ingestion. Our data feed pulls the declared result from multiple independent public sources, the official public declaration, reputable news aggregators that cover Meghalaya, and established community archives. Each source is timestamped.
3. Cross-verification. Before a result is written to the archive, the sources are compared against each other. If two or more independent sources agree, the result is accepted. If sources disagree, the entry is held as pending and a human reviewer inspects it manually.
4. Normalisation. Results are padded to two digits (for example, "7" becomes "07"), date-formatted consistently (in DD MMM YYYY format), and tagged with the correct day of week. This makes month-over-month and year-over-year queries clean.
5. Publication. The verified record is written to a JSON archive file which the tables on this page read from. Updates happen within minutes of the official declaration, but we prioritise correctness over speed.
6. Correction policy. If a result is later found to be erroneous (for example, if an association issues an official correction), the archived record is updated and flagged as corrected with a timestamp. We do not silently overwrite history.

This pipeline is imperfect, no data pipeline is perfect, but it is designed around the principle that a trustworthy archive is one where every row can be traced back to its primary source and where corrections are handled transparently.

For readers new to the sport, here is a brief orientation to each counter that appears in our archive. All four are independent events with their own archers, their own target, and their own daily schedule. A result in one counter is not related to a result in another counter on the same day.

There are genuine, thoughtful uses for a historical Teer archive, and we want to name them explicitly because they are what this page is designed to support.

• Journalism and reporting. Reporters covering Northeast Indian sports, regional culture, or the legal regulation of traditional games often need to quickly look up what the declared outcome was on a particular day. The archive is intended to serve that need.
• Academic research. Students and scholars researching Khasi-Jaintia cultural heritage, the history of traditional sports in India, data journalism, or regional economic and social history can use the archive as primary data for their work.
• Statistical literacy exercises. Teachers and learners can use the archive to practise working with real-world data, computing frequency distributions, examining whether observations match a theoretical uniform distribution, or illustrating the independence of events. This is one of the best ways to build intuition for randomness.
• Personal curiosity. "What was the Shillong result on my birthday last year?" is a perfectly innocent and often delightful question, and the archive is happy to answer it.
• Verification against other sources. If you have seen a result reported elsewhere and want to cross-check it, the archive provides an independent record you can consult.

What the archive is not designed for: predicting future results. Each daily archery event is a fresh physical experiment whose outcome is independent of every past outcome. Historical data is descriptive, not predictive. This is not a tips page, a forecast service, or a "guaranteed number" page, and we will never frame it as such. Informational, cultural and statistical references only.

Trust in any data archive ultimately rests on transparency about what the archive can and cannot promise. Here is our honest accounting.

What we can promise. Every published row is the result of multi-source cross-verification. When two independent public sources agree, the row is considered reliable enough to publish. Dates and day-of-week labels are generated programmatically from the calendar, so they are consistent. The archive is updated daily and we do not retroactively delete history.

What we cannot promise. We are not the official archery association for any of the counters we archive. The single authoritative source for any given day's result is the association that conducted that day's event. Our archive is a faithful secondary source, careful, cross-verified, timestamped, but if there is ever a discrepancy between our record and the official association's record, the official record is authoritative.

Corrections. If you spot an error in any row, please let us know through the contact link in our footer. We take corrections seriously, investigate promptly, and update the archive with a timestamped correction rather than silently overwriting. Keeping the history of corrections visible is itself part of building a trustworthy public record.

Finally, as a reminder: this page is an informational archive of publicly declared results of a legally regulated Meghalaya archery sport. It is a historical reference only, not a prediction tool, not a tips page, and not a gambling facility. We do not accept bets, process payments, or provide forecasts of any kind.